Is a cosmological argument an ontological argument?

Similar to the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, also known as the first cause argument, is a classical argument for the existence of God.

What is meant by ontological argument?

ontological argument, Argument that proceeds from the idea of God to the reality of God. It was first clearly formulated by St. Anselm in his Proslogion (1077–78); a later famous version is given by René Descartes. Anselm began with the concept of God as that than which nothing greater can be conceived.

What is an example of a cosmological argument?

The Kalām Cosmological Argument The universe, including time and space, cannot go back infinitely far in time. Therefore, the universe began to exist. Therefore, the universe’s existence was caused by something. The most-plausible example of a creator of time and space would be something like God.

Is the cosmological argument a posteriori?

It is an a posteriori argument and by that is meant that it proceeds after considering the existence of the physical universe. This argument or proof proceeds from a consideration of the existence and order of the universe.

What is cosmological argument by Thomas Aquinas?

cosmological argument, Form of argument used in natural theology to prove the existence of God. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa theologiae, presented two versions of the cosmological argument: the first-cause argument and the argument from contingency.

Is the cosmological argument a priori?

The Cosmological Argument: An a posteriori argument because it begins with a premise, based on observation, that the universe exists, and is subject to change.

Is the ontological argument a priori or a posteriori?

This kind of reasoning is a priori, meaning that it relies on logical deduction and not sense experience. The Ontological Argument is an a priori argument which claims to prove that God exists.